bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS26523 Province of New Brunswick PNB

Registry name: PNB-TRANSIT - Province of New Brunswick, CA · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 66.7% RPKI valid · 83.3% with a route object
3IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 66.7% with a route object
1RPKI invalid 1 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS26523, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS26523, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

216.66.0.96/27 Invalid: origin None 19 3%low visibility 17
38.64.244.0/24 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 672 100% 67
2001:470:5f5::/48 Valid Nonecovered by 2001:470:5f4::/47 633 100% 69
162.252.132.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 670 100% 68
162.252.132.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 669 99% 68
162.252.134.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 669 99% 68
162.252.135.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 669 99% 68
2604:2f80::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 635 100% 69
2620:0:f0::/48 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 635 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS26523: AS26523:AS-ALL. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS26523 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS26523 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS26523 in itNot covered
AS26523:AS-ALL RADB 4230 Yes 1

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 12 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin1
  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: none2
  • Route object: RIR7
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin216.66.0.96/27ROAs covering it name AS6939, not AS26523. If AS26523 should announce it, add a ROA for AS26523.19 of 673
Route object: none216.66.0.96/27No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS26523 in the RIR database for the space.19 of 673
ROA: none38.64.244.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS26523, maxLength 24.672 of 673
Route object: RIR38.64.244.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: none2001:470:5f5::/48No route object for it. A route object for 2001:470:5f4::/47 with origin AS26523 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS26523 in the RIR database for the space.633 of 636
Route object: RIR162.252.132.0/22Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: RIR162.252.132.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR162.252.134.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR162.252.135.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR2604:2f80::/32Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636
Route object: RIR2620:0:f0::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS26523 whose prefix no peer sees AS26523 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

2001:470:5f4::/47ARINValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.