bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS19122 eStruxture AS19122

Registry name: ESTRUXTURE-ON-19122 - eStruxture Data Centers Inc., CA · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 16.7% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
3IPv6 routes 66.7% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
6No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS19122, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS19122, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

38.132.48.0/20 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 673 100% 67
192.34.55.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
199.167.131.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
216.71.120.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
216.170.124.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
2602:fbb0::/36 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 636 100% 67
69.165.84.0/22 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
2605:9000:6::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 636 100% 67
2605:9000:c::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 636 100% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS19122: AS-ESTRUXTURE. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS19122 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS19122 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS19122 in itNot covered
AS-ESTRUXTURE ARIN1 member set in no database: AS-MEDIA-HOSTS 5551,206 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 9 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none6
  • Route object: RIR1
  • AS-SET: missing member1
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none38.132.48.0/20No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 20.673 of 673
Route object: RIR38.132.48.0/20Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
ROA: none192.34.55.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 24.671 of 673
ROA: none199.167.131.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 24.671 of 673
ROA: none216.71.120.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 24.671 of 673
ROA: none216.170.124.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 24.671 of 673
ROA: none2602:fbb0::/36No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS19122, maxLength 36.636 of 636
AS-SET: missing memberAS-ESTRUXTUREAS-ESTRUXTURE (ARIN) lists AS-MEDIA-HOSTS; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS19122 whose prefix no peer sees AS19122 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

208.90.28.0/23ARINNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.