bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS16342 Toya

Registry name: TOYA Toya sp.z.o.o, PL · PeeringDB

12IPv4 routes 91.7% RPKI valid · 91.7% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1RPKI invalid 0 origin · 1 maxLength
0No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
8Route objects not announced registered with origin AS16342, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS16342, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

31.183.140.102/32 Invalid: maxLength Nonecovered by 31.183.128.0/18 1 0%low visibility 1
31.182.0.0/15 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
31.182.0.0/17 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
31.182.128.0/17 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
31.183.128.0/18 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
31.183.192.0/18 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
77.237.0.0/19 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
85.89.160.0/20 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
85.89.176.0/20 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
185.67.216.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
217.113.224.0/20 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
31.183.0.0/17 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 67
2a03:af80::/29 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS16342: AS-TOYA. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS16342 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS16342 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS16342 in itNot covered
AS-TOYA RIPE 25386 Yes 1

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: maxLength1
  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: not announced8
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: maxLength31.183.140.102/32ROA 31.182.0.0/15 AS16342 has maxLength 18; the route is a /32. Raise the maxLength, or add a ROA for 31.183.140.102/32.1 of 673
Route object: none31.183.140.102/32No route object for it. A route object for 31.183.128.0/18 with origin AS16342 covers it (too long for filters allowing more-specifics up to /24). Add a route object with origin AS16342 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS16342 whose prefix no peer sees AS16342 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

31.182.0.0/16RIPEValid
31.183.0.0/16RIPEValid
31.183.128.0/17RIPEValid
185.67.216.0/24RIPEValid
185.67.217.0/24RIPEValid
185.67.218.0/24RIPEValid
185.67.219.0/24RIPEValid
2a03:af80::/32RIPEInvalid: maxLength

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.