bgpreport

Exchanges · data from 2026-11-12

WHY2025 IXP

Geesterambacht, NL · IX Report finds no sign this exchange is running · members from IX Report (2026-11-12)

2Members 2 originate routes
9Their routes 88.9% RPKI valid · 77.8% with a route object
0RPKI invalid from 0 members
1No ROA 2 with no route object for their origin
1AS-SET includes own ASN 0 missing it · 0 not found · 1 none
2Route-server members 1 of their 9 routes left out by an RPKI + IRR filter

Route servers: RPKI + IRR filtering

For each member on the route servers: of the routes it originates, how many a route server would leave out if it dropped RPKI-invalid routes and filtered on the IRR the way IXP route servers commonly build their prefix lists: the member's AS-SETs from PeeringDB (with none, its own AS number), expanded as bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net, with more-specifics of a route object accepted down to /24 and /48 (bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). 0 routes are RPKI invalid and 1 fail the IRR filter. Only each member's own routes are counted: the collectors show a route's origin, not which network it came through, so customers' routes aren't in these numbers. Route objects only in LEVEL3 or IDNIC (no public dump) count as missing.

AS51517Oranjekoek AS51517 no AS-SET in PeeringDB 7 0 1 1 14%

1 other route-server members would have every route they originate accepted.

Members

Every member on IX Report's lists for WHY2025 IXP, with the routes it originates. Also as members.csv.

AS51517Oranjekoek Yes 75 v4 · 2 v6 86% 0 71% none in PeeringDB
AS208709April Faye John Yes 20 v4 · 2 v6 100% 0 100% includes own ASN