Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS9655 TPMNETWORK-AS-AP - TPM Corp. Berhad,
Registry name: TPMNETWORK-AS-AP - TPM Corp. Berhad,, MY · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS9655, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 202.129.160.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.161.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.162.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.163.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.164.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.165.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.166.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.167.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.168.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.173.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.174.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
| 202.129.175.0/24 | No ROA | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 671 100% |
AS-SET
AS9655 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 34 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: none12
- Route object: not announced22
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: none | 202.129.160.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.161.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.162.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.163.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.164.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.165.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.166.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.167.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.168.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.173.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.174.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
| ROA: none | 202.129.175.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9655, maxLength 24. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS9655 whose prefix no peer sees AS9655 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 202.129.160.0/20 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.160.0/21 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.160.0/22 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.160.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.162.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.164.0/22 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.164.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.166.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.168.0/21 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.168.0/22 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.168.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.169.0/24 | APNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.170.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.170.0/24 | APNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.171.0/24 | APNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.172.0/22 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.172.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.172.0/24 | APNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 202.129.174.0/23 | NTTCOM, RADB | No ROA |
| 2401:5980::/48 | APNIC | No ROA |
| 2401:5980:a::/48 | APNIC | No ROA |
| 2401:5980:b::/48 | APNIC | No ROA |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.