bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS964 IonSwitch NW

Registry name: IONSWITCH-NW - IonSwitch NW, LLC, US · PeeringDB

8IPv4 routes 87.5% RPKI valid · 87.5% with a route object
2IPv6 routes 50.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS964, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS964, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

23.140.96.0/22 No ROA None 650 97% 67
2606:ddc0::/32 No ROA RIR databaseARIN 634 100% 67
23.140.96.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 673 100% 67
23.140.98.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 673 100% 67
23.140.99.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 673 100% 67
23.138.40.0/22 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
23.140.97.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
198.73.190.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 67
2602:fe54::/32 Valid RIR databaseARIN 634 100% 67
23.138.41.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 2 0%low visibility 2

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS964: ARIN::AS-IONSWITCH. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS964 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS964 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS964 in itNot covered
ARIN::AS-IONSWITCH ARIN 112219 Yes 1

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 7 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none23.140.96.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS964, maxLength 22.650 of 673
Route object: none23.140.96.0/22No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS964 in the RIR database for the space.650 of 673
ROA: none2606:ddc0::/32No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS964, maxLength 32.634 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS964 whose prefix no peer sees AS964 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

23.138.40.0/24ARINValid
23.138.42.0/24ARINValid
23.138.43.0/24ARINValid
2605:fb80:e000::/36ARINInvalid: origin

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.