bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS9332 Wannan Trading Pty Ltd

Registry name: WANNAN-AS-AP - Wannan Trading Pty Ltd, AU · PeeringDB

1IPv4 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS9332, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS9332, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
103.189.180.0/23 No ROA Other IRR onlyNTTCOM 670 100% 68
2001:df0:d640::/48 No ROA Other IRR onlyNTTCOM 631 99% 69

AS-SET

AS9332's PeeringDB record names no AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 6 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: RIR2
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none103.189.180.0/23No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9332, maxLength 23.670 of 673
Route object: RIR103.189.180.0/23Route object only in NTTCOM. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
ROA: none2001:df0:d640::/48No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS9332, maxLength 48.631 of 636
Route object: RIR2001:df0:d640::/48Route object only in NTTCOM. Add it in the RIR database for the space.631 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS9332 whose prefix no peer sees AS9332 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

2001:470:4bc::/48ARINValid
2402:9e80:11::/48RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.