bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS6779 Fujitsu Services

Registry name: ICLNET-AS Fujitsu Services Ltd., GB · PeeringDB

2IPv4 routes 50.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS6779, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS6779, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
185.13.50.0/23 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
185.13.48.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67

AS-SET

AS6779's PeeringDB record names no AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 2 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none185.13.50.0/23No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS6779, maxLength 23.672 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS6779 whose prefix no peer sees AS6779 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

62.60.126.0/24RIPENo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.