bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS64179 Zux PY

Registry name: AS64179 - ZUX NET E.A.S., PY · PeeringDB

3IPv4 routes 66.7% RPKI valid · 33.3% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1RPKI invalid 1 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS64179, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS64179, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

96.126.162.0/23 Invalid: origin Other origin only 2 0%low visibility 2
206.62.119.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 206.62.116.0/22 669 99% 67
2803:8930::/32 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 630 99% 67
206.62.116.0/22 Valid RIR databaseARIN 123 18% 44

AS-SET

AS64179's PeeringDB record names no AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 3 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin1
  • Route object: none2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin96.126.162.0/23ROAs covering it name AS3561, not AS64179. If AS64179 should announce it, add a ROA for AS64179.2 of 673
Route object: none96.126.162.0/23Route objects for it name AS3561. Add a route object with origin AS64179 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
Route object: none206.62.119.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 206.62.116.0/22 with origin AS64179 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS64179 in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS64179 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.