Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS61349 MaxiTEL Telecom B.V.
Registry name: MAXITEL MaxiTEL Telecom B.V., NL · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS61349, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 37.46.198.0/24 | Invalid: origin | None | 1 0%low visibility |
| 5.144.88.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 5.144.92.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 45.153.0.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 91.199.236.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 91.205.212.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.29.200.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.29.201.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.29.202.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.29.203.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.173.12.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.178.196.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 2a04:4340::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
| 2a04:4341::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
| 2a04:4343::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
| 2a04:4344::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS61349: AS-MAXITEL. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS61349 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS61349 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS61349 in it | Not covered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS-MAXITEL | RIPE | 11 | 4 | Yes | 1 |
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: origin1
- Route object: none1
- Route object: not announced8
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: origin | 37.46.198.0/24 | ROAs covering it name AS6206, not AS61349. If AS61349 should announce it, add a ROA for AS61349. |
| Route object: none | 37.46.198.0/24 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS61349 in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS61349 whose prefix no peer sees AS61349 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 5.144.91.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 91.205.215.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 147.78.238.0/23 | RIPE | No ROA |
| 185.29.200.0/22 | RIPE | Valid |
| 185.173.15.0/24 | RIPE | Invalid: maxLength |
| 2001:678:198::/48 | RIPE | No ROA |
| 2a04:4342::/32 | RIPE | Valid |
| 2a04:4346::/32 | RIPE | Valid |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.