bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS59536 RizBykNet

Registry name: rizbuknet-as RIZBUKNET LLC, UA · PeeringDB

1IPv4 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS59536, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS59536, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
213.178.156.0/22 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 67

AS-SET

AS59536's PeeringDB record names no AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 5 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none213.178.156.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS59536, maxLength 22.670 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS59536 whose prefix no peer sees AS59536 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

213.178.156.0/24RIPENo ROA
213.178.157.0/24RIPENo ROA
213.178.158.0/24RIPENo ROA
213.178.159.0/24RIPENo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.