Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS59432 GINERNET
Registry name: GINERNET GINERNET S.L., ES · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS59432, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 2a03:c7c2::/32 | Valid | None | 635 100% |
| 5.134.112.0/21 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 5.134.113.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.47.128.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 185.47.130.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 188.213.4.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 188.213.6.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 188.213.7.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 5.134.112.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 672 100% |
| 5.134.114.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 672 100% |
| 82.23.181.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 672 100% |
| 5.134.115.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
| 5.134.116.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 669 99% |
| 5.134.117.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
| 5.134.118.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 669 99% |
| 5.134.119.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 669 99% |
| 182.54.235.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 669 99% |
| 185.47.128.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 669 99% |
| 185.47.129.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
| 185.47.131.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
| 188.213.4.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 669 99% |
| 188.213.5.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 669 99% |
| 2a03:c7c0::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 635 100% |
| 2a03:c7c1::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 635 100% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS59432: RIPE::AS-GINERNET. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS59432 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS59432 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS59432 in it | Not covered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIPE::AS-GINERNET | RIPE | 15 | 1 | Yes | 1 |
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 6 are in fix.csv.
- Route object: none1
- Route object: not announced5
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Route object: none | 2a03:c7c2::/32 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS59432 in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS59432 whose prefix no peer sees AS59432 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 46.37.125.0/24 | RADB, RIPE | Valid |
| 89.116.68.0/23 | RIPE | Valid |
| 95.214.182.0/23 | RIPE | No ROA |
| 182.54.233.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 185.199.150.0/23 | RIPE | No ROA |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.