bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS59149 TUJUH DELAPAN SEMBILAN NET

Registry name: TUJUHDELAPANSEMBILANNET-AS-ID - PT. TUJUH DELAPAN SEMBILAN NET, ID · PeeringDB

9IPv4 routes 88.9% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
2Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS59149, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS59149, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

103.40.108.0/24 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 3 0%low visibility 4
103.111.249.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.111.250.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.111.251.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.254.168.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 68
103.254.169.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.254.171.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.111.248.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 672 100% 69
103.254.170.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 3 0%low visibility 4

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS59149: AS59149:AS-JATAYU. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS59149 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS59149 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS59149 in itNot covered
AS59149:AS-JATAYU In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 15 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: RIR9
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none103.40.108.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS59149, maxLength 24.3 of 673
Route object: RIR103.40.108.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.3 of 673
Route object: RIR103.111.249.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.111.250.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.111.251.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.254.168.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.254.169.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.254.171.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673
Route object: RIR103.111.248.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR103.254.170.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.3 of 673
AS-SET: not foundAS59149:AS-JATAYUPeeringDB names AS59149:AS-JATAYU; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS59149 whose prefix no peer sees AS59149 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

103.111.248.0/22RADBValid
103.111.248.0/23RADBValid
103.254.168.0/22NTTCOMValid
202.58.242.0/23NTTCOMNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.