bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS58476 DJP-AS-ID - DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK

Registry name: DJP-AS-ID - DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK, ID · not in PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS58476, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS58476, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
43.242.133.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
43.242.132.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.28.106.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB 673 100% 69
103.72.110.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM 673 100% 69
103.72.111.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM 673 100% 69
103.28.107.0/24 Valid RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB 672 100% 68

AS-SET

AS58476 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR1
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR43.242.133.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM, RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS58476 whose prefix no peer sees AS58476 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

43.242.132.0/23RADBNo ROA
103.28.106.0/23NTTCOMNo ROA
2001:df0:26f::/48APNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.