Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS56207 COMCLARK-PH - ComClark Network & Technology Corp
Registry name: COMCLARK-PH - ComClark Network & Technology Corp, PH · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS56207, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 182.18.196.0/24 | Valid | Other origin only | 666 99% |
| 2403:4c0:7800::/37 | Valid | None | 636 100% |
| 139.135.192.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.196.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.200.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.204.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.208.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.212.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.216.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.224.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.228.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.232.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.236.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.240.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.244.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.248.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.252.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.254.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 139.135.255.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 672 100% |
| 202.81.164.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 671 100% |
| 139.135.220.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | 2 0%low visibility |
AS-SET
AS56207 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.
- Route object: none2
- Route object: not announced2
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Route object: none | 182.18.196.0/24 | Route objects for it name AS23944. Add a route object with origin AS56207 in the RIR database for the space. |
| Route object: none | 2403:4c0:7800::/37 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS56207 in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS56207 whose prefix no peer sees AS56207 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 61.9.64.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 139.135.252.0/22 | APNIC, NTTCOM, RADB | Valid |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.