Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS55569 Criteo Asia
Registry name: CRITEO-AS-AP - Criteo APAC, JP · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS55569, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 182.161.72.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 673 100% |
| 182.161.74.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 671 100% |
| 182.161.75.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 671 100% |
| 182.161.73.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 670 100% |
| 2406:2600:1::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600:2::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600:4::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600:7::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600:8::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600:b::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 636 100% |
| 2406:2600::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 635 100% |
| 2406:2600:a::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 635 100% |
| 2402:4480:203::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 2402:4480:204::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 2402:4480:305::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 2402:4480:306::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 2406:2600:3::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 2406:2600:6::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseAPNIC | 605 95% |
| 91.199.242.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 146 22% |
| 91.212.98.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 146 22% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS55569: AS-CRITEO-APAC. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS55569 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS55569 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS55569 in it | Not covered | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS-CRITEO-APAC | In no IRR database read today. | |||||
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 27 are in fix.csv.
- AS-SET: not found1
- Route object: not announced26
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| AS-SET: not found | AS-CRITEO-APAC | PeeringDB names AS-CRITEO-APAC; no IRR database read has it. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS55569 whose prefix no peer sees AS55569 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 103.229.140.0/22 | APNIC | Valid |
| 103.229.140.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 116.51.31.192/30 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 116.51.31.196/30 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 116.213.20.0/22 | APNIC | Valid |
| 116.213.20.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 116.213.21.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 116.213.22.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 116.213.23.0/24 | APNIC | Valid |
| 182.161.72.0/22 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2001:218:2000:11::/64 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 2001:218:2000:21::/64 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 2001:218:4001:1::/64 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 2001:218:4001:2::/64 | APNIC, NTTCOM | Valid |
| 2400:8800:1002::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2400:8800:1003::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2400:8800:1004::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2400:8800:1005::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600::/32 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:5::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:9::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:c::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:d::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:e::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2406:2600:f::/48 | APNIC | Valid |
| 2a02:2638::/48 | RIPE | Valid |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.