Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS5377 Marlink AS
Registry name: MARLINK-EMEA Marlink AS, NO · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS5377, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 2a02:6600:f001::/48 | Valid | Nonecovered by 2a02:6600::/32 | 636 100% |
| 77.70.128.0/17 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.128.0/19 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.144.0/20 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.160.0/20 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.192.0/19 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.240.0/20 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.219.192.0/18 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.219.196.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.220.0.0/16 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.220.88.0/21 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.220.94.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRADB, RIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.220.174.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.252.234.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 77.70.252.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 672 100% |
| 77.70.254.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 672 100% |
| 77.70.255.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 672 100% |
| 193.220.165.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 193.220.220.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 193.220.240.0/20 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 216.9.230.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseARIN | 671 100% |
| 2a02:6601::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 636 100% |
| 2a02:6601:c000::/36 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 635 100% |
| 2a02:6600::/29 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
| 2a02:6600:f000::/48 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS5377: RIPE::AS-MARLINK. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS5377 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS5377 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS5377 in it | Not covered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIPE::AS-MARLINK | RIPE | 6 | 1 | Yes | 0 |
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 18 are in fix.csv.
- Route object: none1
- Route object: not announced17
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Route object: none | 2a02:6600:f001::/48 | No route object for it. A route object for 2a02:6600::/32 with origin AS5377 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS5377 in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS5377 whose prefix no peer sees AS5377 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 77.70.176.0/22 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.181.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.184.0/21 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.207.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.252.0/23 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.253.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 77.70.254.0/23 | RIPE | Valid |
| 154.58.196.0/24 | RADB | No ROA |
| 154.62.77.0/24 | RADB | No ROA |
| 193.220.224.0/20 | RIPE | Valid |
| 193.220.230.0/24 | RIPE | Valid |
| 204.8.41.0/24 | ARIN | Valid |
| 216.9.228.0/22 | ARIN | Valid |
| 216.9.228.0/23 | ARIN | Valid |
| 2a02:6600::/32 | RIPE | Valid |
| 2a02:6602::/32 | RIPE | Valid |
| 2a02:6603::/32 | RIPE | Valid |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.