bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS53283 Litware

Registry name: LITWARE - Litware LLC, US · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 66.7% with a route object
4IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS53283, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS53283, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

140.235.234.0/23 Valid Nonecovered by 140.235.232.0/22 672 100% 67
140.235.232.0/23 Valid Nonecovered by 140.235.232.0/22 670 100% 69
23.149.72.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 672 100% 67
23.157.104.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 672 100% 67
23.149.73.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 670 100% 68
23.157.105.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 666 99% 68
2607:33c0::/32 Valid RIR databaseARIN 635 100% 69
2607:33c0:c0::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 635 100% 69
2607:33c0:d0::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 634 100% 70
2607:33c0:f0::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 633 100% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS53283: AS53283:AS-ALL. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS53283 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS53283 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS53283 in itNot covered
AS53283:AS-ALL ARIN 1212 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 6 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none2
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none140.235.234.0/23No route object for it. A route object for 140.235.232.0/22 with origin AS53283 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS53283 in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: none140.235.232.0/23No route object for it. A route object for 140.235.232.0/22 with origin AS53283 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS53283 in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS53283 whose prefix no peer sees AS53283 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

23.157.104.0/23ARINValid
38.105.3.0/24RADBNo ROA
140.235.232.0/22ARINValid
2001:470:1ae::/48ARINValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.