bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS50518 gl G&L Geissendoerfer & Leschinsky GmbH

Registry name: gl G&L Geissendoerfer & Leschinsky GmbH, DE · not in PeeringDB

4IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
6Route objects not announced registered with origin AS50518, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS50518, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

83.231.152.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyNTTCOM 673 100% 67
45.94.248.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 68
45.94.251.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 68
2a11:7400:f2::/48 Valid RIR databaseNTTCOM, RIPE 633 100% 67
45.94.250.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 2 0%low visibility 2

AS-SET

AS50518 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 7 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR1
  • Route object: not announced6
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR83.231.152.0/24Route object only in NTTCOM. Add it in the RIR database for the space.673 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS50518 whose prefix no peer sees AS50518 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

45.94.248.0/22RIPEValid
45.94.248.0/23RIPEValid
45.94.249.0/24RIPEValid
45.94.250.0/24RIPEValid
2a11:7400::/29RIPEValid
2a11:7400:d1::/48RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.