Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS48866 NETCRACKER-EMEA-AS Netcracker Technology EMEA Limited
Registry name: NETCRACKER-EMEA-AS Netcracker Technology EMEA Limited, GB · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS48866, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 109.245.246.152/29 | Invalid: origin | None | 2 0%low visibility |
| 154.61.134.0/24 | No ROA | None | 673 100% |
| 192.231.26.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 193.218.186.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 195.191.41.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 195.211.250.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 91.223.178.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 195.191.40.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
AS-SET
AS48866 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: origin1
- ROA: none1
- Route object: none2
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: origin | 109.245.246.152/29 | ROAs covering it name AS15958, not AS48866. If AS48866 should announce it, add a ROA for AS48866. |
| Route object: none | 109.245.246.152/29 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS48866 in the RIR database for the space. |
| ROA: none | 154.61.134.0/24 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS48866, maxLength 24. |
| Route object: none | 154.61.134.0/24 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS48866 in the RIR database for the space. |
Route objects not announced
Every route object with origin AS48866 is announced.
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.