bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS43566 tyntec

Registry name: tyntec TYNTEC S.A.C., PE · PeeringDB

11IPv4 routes 81.8% RPKI valid · 81.8% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
9Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
15Route objects not announced registered with origin AS43566, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS43566, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

78.110.224.0/20 No ROA None 2 0%low visibility 2
78.110.232.0/21 No ROA None 2 0%low visibility 2
78.110.233.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
78.110.234.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
78.110.224.0/21 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 4 1%low visibility 4
78.110.232.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 4 1%low visibility 4
78.110.235.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 4 1%low visibility 4
78.110.236.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 4 1%low visibility 4
178.23.24.0/21 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 4 1%low visibility 5
178.23.24.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 2 0%low visibility 2
178.23.28.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 2 0%low visibility 2

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS43566: AS-TYNTEC. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS43566 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS43566 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS43566 in itNot covered
AS-TYNTEC RIPE 2134 Yes 2

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 19 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: none2
  • Route object: not announced15
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none78.110.224.0/20No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS43566, maxLength 20.2 of 673
Route object: none78.110.224.0/20No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS43566 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
ROA: none78.110.232.0/21No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS43566, maxLength 21.2 of 673
Route object: none78.110.232.0/21No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS43566 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS43566 whose prefix no peer sees AS43566 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

91.199.83.0/24RADBValid
178.23.24.0/23RIPEValid
178.23.24.0/24RIPEValid
178.23.25.0/24RIPEValid
178.23.26.0/23RIPEValid
178.23.27.0/24RIPEValid
178.23.28.0/24RIPEValid
178.23.29.0/24RIPEValid
2a11:7f80::/32RIPEValid
2a11:7f80::/33RIPEValid
2a11:7f80::/34RIPEValid
2a11:7f80:4000::/34RIPEValid
2a11:7f80:8000::/33RIPEValid
2a11:7f80:8000::/34RIPEValid
2a11:7f80:c000::/34RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.