bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS38665 SHINDUCKPYUNG-AS-KR-KR - KCTC

Registry name: SHINDUCKPYUNG-AS-KR-KR - KCTC, KR · not in PeeringDB

2IPv4 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 50.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
2Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS38665, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS38665, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

210.97.12.32/27 No ROA None 14 2%low visibility 13
58.72.241.208/28 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 13 2%low visibility 13

AS-SET

AS38665 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 5 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: RIR1
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none210.97.12.32/27No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS38665, maxLength 27.14 of 673
Route object: none210.97.12.32/27No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS38665 in the RIR database for the space.14 of 673
ROA: none58.72.241.208/28No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS38665, maxLength 28.13 of 673
Route object: RIR58.72.241.208/28Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.13 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS38665 whose prefix no peer sees AS38665 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

121.160.79.0/24RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.