bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS34757 Sibirskie Seti AS34757

Registry name: SIBSET-NSK-AS Sibirskie Seti Ltd., RU · PeeringDB

11IPv4 routes 45.5% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
7No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
32Route objects not announced registered with origin AS34757, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS34757, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

80.64.168.0/21 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
80.89.192.0/20 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
85.118.224.0/21 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
89.31.112.0/21 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
89.189.176.0/20 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
93.92.216.0/21 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
2a00:bfc0::/35 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 636 100% 69
5.44.168.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
5.44.168.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
109.111.176.0/20 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
193.238.128.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
5.44.169.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 66

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS34757: AS-SIBSET. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS34757 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS34757 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS34757 in itNot covered
AS-SIBSET RIPE 111144 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 39 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none7
  • Route object: not announced32
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none80.64.168.0/21No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 21.673 of 673
ROA: none80.89.192.0/20No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 20.673 of 673
ROA: none85.118.224.0/21No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 21.673 of 673
ROA: none89.31.112.0/21No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 21.673 of 673
ROA: none89.189.176.0/20No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 20.673 of 673
ROA: none93.92.216.0/21No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 21.673 of 673
ROA: none2a00:bfc0::/35No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34757, maxLength 35.636 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS34757 whose prefix no peer sees AS34757 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

80.64.168.0/22RIPENo ROA
80.64.168.0/23RIPENo ROA
80.64.170.0/23RIPENo ROA
80.64.172.0/22RIPENo ROA
80.64.172.0/23RIPENo ROA
80.64.174.0/23RIPENo ROA
80.64.175.0/24RIPENo ROA
89.189.176.0/22RIPENo ROA
89.189.180.0/22RIPENo ROA
89.189.180.0/23RIPENo ROA
89.189.182.0/23RIPENo ROA
89.189.184.0/21RIPENo ROA
89.189.184.0/22RIPENo ROA
89.189.188.0/22RIPENo ROA
89.189.191.0/24RIPENo ROA
109.111.176.0/21RIPEValid
109.111.176.0/22RIPEValid
109.111.176.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.178.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.180.0/22RIPEValid
109.111.180.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.182.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.184.0/21RIPEValid
109.111.184.0/22RIPEValid
109.111.184.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.186.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.188.0/22RIPEValid
109.111.188.0/23RIPEValid
109.111.190.0/23RIPEValid
193.238.128.0/23RIPEValid
193.238.130.0/23RIPEValid
2a00:bfc0::/32RIPENo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.