bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS34696 Mismelink Networks

Registry name: AS-MISMELINK MISMELINK NETWORKS, SL, ES · PeeringDB

10IPv4 routes 90.0% RPKI valid · 90.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
12Route objects not announced registered with origin AS34696, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS34696, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

185.237.136.0/22 No ROA None 2 0%low visibility 2
5.42.208.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
185.128.60.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
185.128.61.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
185.128.62.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
185.238.86.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
185.238.87.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
206.203.32.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
81.172.101.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 66
185.232.36.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 671 100% 66

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS34696: AS34696:AS-MISMELINK. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS34696 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS34696 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS34696 in itNot covered
AS34696:AS-MISMELINK RIPElists itself further down1 member set in no database: AS-NET-WIBER 126192,613 Yes 1

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 15 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: none1
  • AS-SET: missing member1
  • Route object: not announced12
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none185.237.136.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS34696, maxLength 22.2 of 673
Route object: none185.237.136.0/22No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS34696 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
AS-SET: missing memberAS34696:AS-MISMELINKAS34696:AS-MISMELINK (RIPE) lists AS-NET-WIBER; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS34696 whose prefix no peer sees AS34696 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

185.128.60.0/22RIPENo ROA
206.203.24.0/23RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.24.0/24RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.25.0/24RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.26.0/23RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.26.0/24RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.27.0/24RIPEInvalid: origin
206.203.32.0/24RIPEValid
206.203.33.0/24RIPEValid
206.203.34.0/24RIPEValid
206.203.35.0/24RIPEValid
2a0d:340::/32RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.