Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS328633 MikroTikSA Networks
Registry name: MikroTikSA Networks CC - MikroTikSA Networks CC, ZA · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS328633, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 102.201.228.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 673 100% |
| 102.217.184.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 673 100% |
| 102.223.104.0/22 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 673 100% |
| 2c0f:e848::/32 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 634 100% |
| 102.217.184.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 71 11% |
| 102.217.186.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 71 11% |
| 102.223.104.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 71 11% |
| 102.223.106.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 71 11% |
| 102.201.228.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 67 10%low visibility |
| 102.201.230.0/23 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 67 10%low visibility |
| 102.217.184.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.217.185.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.217.186.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.217.187.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.223.104.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.223.105.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.223.106.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.223.107.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 58 9%low visibility |
| 102.201.228.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 52 8%low visibility |
| 102.201.229.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 52 8%low visibility |
| 102.201.230.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 52 8%low visibility |
| 102.201.231.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseAFRINIC | 52 8%low visibility |
AS-SET
PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS328633: AFRINIC::AS-MIKROTIKSA-ALL. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS328633 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS328633 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.
| Name | Database | ASNs | Sets | AS328633 in it | Not covered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRINIC::AS-MIKROTIKSA-ALL | AFRINIC | 1 | 1 | Yes | 0 |
Fix list
Nothing to change: every route is RPKI valid with a route object in an RIR database, and every route object is announced.
Route objects not announced
Every route object with origin AS328633 is announced.
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.