bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS32779 SMART-CITY-GBCC - SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Registry name: SMART-CITY-GBCC - SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, US · not in PeeringDB

3IPv4 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
3No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS32779, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS32779, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
24.56.128.0/24 No ROA RIR databaseARIN, NTTCOM 668 99% 67
24.75.224.0/22 No ROA RIR databaseARIN, NTTCOM 668 99% 67
66.78.228.0/22 No ROA RIR databaseARIN, NTTCOM 668 99% 67

AS-SET

AS32779 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 7 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none3
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none24.56.128.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS32779, maxLength 24.668 of 673
ROA: none24.75.224.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS32779, maxLength 22.668 of 673
ROA: none66.78.228.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS32779, maxLength 22.668 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS32779 whose prefix no peer sees AS32779 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

65.90.100.0/22NTTCOMNo ROA
67.110.78.0/23NTTCOMNo ROA
74.117.108.0/22RADBNo ROA
2604:b180:10::/44NTTCOMNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.