bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS30937 Walhalla__AS30937 Walhalla Data Center Services SL

Registry name: Walhalla__AS30937 Walhalla Data Center Services SL, ES · not in PeeringDB

9IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS30937, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS30937, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
45.140.10.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
45.141.124.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
45.141.126.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
45.157.200.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
91.232.71.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
185.4.244.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
188.208.218.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
80.68.155.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
193.16.216.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 671 100% 67
2a01:a4c0::/36 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 67

AS-SET

AS30937 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 3 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: not announced3

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS30937 whose prefix no peer sees AS30937 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

46.253.138.0/24RIPEValid
2a01:a4c0::/32RIPEValid
2a01:a4c0:1000::/36RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.