bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS271749 Arkatel

Registry name: AS271749 - ARKATEL SERVICOS EM TELECOMUNICACOES EIRELI, BR · PeeringDB

4IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
4IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 25.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 3 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS271749, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS271749, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2804:806c:3000::/37 Valid Nonecovered by 2804:806c::/33 636 100% 67
2804:806c:4000::/37 Valid Nonecovered by 2804:806c::/33 636 100% 67
2804:806c:5000::/37 Valid Nonecovered by 2804:806c::/33 636 100% 67
179.0.194.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 672 100% 67
200.10.236.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 672 100% 67
200.10.236.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 672 100% 67
179.0.195.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 671 100% 67
2804:806c::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 636 100% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS271749: AS-271749. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS271749 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS271749 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS271749 in itNot covered
AS-271749 In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 13 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none3
  • Route object: RIR5
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none2804:806c:3000::/37No route object for it. A route object for 2804:806c::/33 with origin AS271749 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS271749 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: none2804:806c:4000::/37No route object for it. A route object for 2804:806c::/33 with origin AS271749 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS271749 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: none2804:806c:5000::/37No route object for it. A route object for 2804:806c::/33 with origin AS271749 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS271749 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: RIR179.0.194.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR200.10.236.0/23Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR200.10.236.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR179.0.195.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:806c::/32Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
AS-SET: not foundAS-271749PeeringDB names AS-271749; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS271749 whose prefix no peer sees AS271749 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

179.0.194.0/23TCValid
200.10.237.0/24TCValid
2804:806c::/33TCValid
2804:806c:8000::/33TCValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.