bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS270810 Mi Conect Rede de Acesso as Comunicações LTDA

Registry name: AS270810 - Mi Conect Rede de Acesso as Comunicacoes LTDA, BR · PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
3Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS270810, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS270810, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

200.219.16.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 672 100% 67
200.219.19.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 670 100% 67
2804:71c4::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 634 100% 69
200.219.16.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 211 31% 56
200.219.17.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 211 31% 56
200.219.16.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 2 0%low visibility 2
200.219.18.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 2 0%low visibility 2
200.219.18.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 2 0%low visibility 2

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS270810: AS270810:AS-MICONECT. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS270810 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS270810 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS270810 in itNot covered
AS270810:AS-MICONECT TC1 member set in no database: AS270810:AS-MICONECT-CUSTOMERS 118 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 9 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR8
  • AS-SET: missing member1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR200.219.16.0/23Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR200.219.19.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:71c4::/32Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.634 of 636
Route object: RIR200.219.16.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.211 of 673
Route object: RIR200.219.17.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.211 of 673
Route object: RIR200.219.16.0/22Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
Route object: RIR200.219.18.0/23Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
Route object: RIR200.219.18.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
AS-SET: missing memberAS270810:AS-MICONECTAS270810:AS-MICONECT (TC) lists AS270810:AS-MICONECT-CUSTOMERS; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS270810 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.