bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS269174 FIXANET TELECOM PROVEDOR DE INTERNET

Registry name: AS269174 - FIXANET TELECOM PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA, BR · PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS269174, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS269174, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

45.180.104.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 67
45.180.104.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 67
45.180.106.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 671 100% 67
45.180.106.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 67
45.180.104.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 669 99% 67
45.180.105.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 669 99% 67
45.180.107.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 669 99% 67
2804:608c::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 635 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS269174: AS269174:AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS269174 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS269174 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS269174 in itNot covered
AS269174:AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS TC 129 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 9 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR8
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR45.180.104.0/22Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.104.0/23Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.106.0/23Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.106.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.104.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.105.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR45.180.107.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.669 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:608c::/32Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS269174 whose prefix no peer sees AS269174 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

2804:7374::/32RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.