bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS267841 AS267841 - GIGAS HOSTING COLOMBIA S.A.S.

Registry name: AS267841 - GIGAS HOSTING COLOMBIA S.A.S., CO · not in PeeringDB

5IPv4 routes 80.0% RPKI valid · 80.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS267841, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS267841, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

168.232.32.0/22 No ROA Other origin only 668 99% 67
45.163.28.0/24 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 668 99% 67
45.163.29.0/24 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 668 99% 67
45.163.30.0/24 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC 668 99% 67
170.239.154.0/23 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC 668 99% 67

AS-SET

AS267841 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none168.232.32.0/22No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS267841, maxLength 22.668 of 673
Route object: none168.232.32.0/22Route objects for it name AS14259. Add a route object with origin AS267841 in the RIR database for the space.668 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS267841 whose prefix no peer sees AS267841 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

45.163.28.0/23RADBNo ROA
2803:31a0::/32LACNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.