bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS267776 OPTIWISP

Registry name: AS267776 - OPTIWISP SPA, CL · PeeringDB

11IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
4Route objects not announced registered with origin AS267776, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS267776, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

143.202.12.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 110 16% 41
143.202.12.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 110 16% 41
143.202.13.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 110 16% 41
143.202.14.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 110 16% 41
143.202.15.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 110 16% 41
45.171.220.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 109 16% 41
45.171.221.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 109 16% 41
45.171.222.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 109 16% 41
45.171.223.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 109 16% 41
45.171.220.0/22 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 672 100% 67
143.202.12.0/22 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 668 99% 67
2803:e7a0::/32 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC 630 99% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS267776: AS267776:AS-ALL. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS267776 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS267776 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS267776 in itNot covered
AS267776:AS-ALL In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 14 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR9
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced4
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR143.202.12.0/23Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.110 of 673
Route object: RIR143.202.12.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.110 of 673
Route object: RIR143.202.13.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.110 of 673
Route object: RIR143.202.14.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.110 of 673
Route object: RIR143.202.15.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.110 of 673
Route object: RIR45.171.220.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.109 of 673
Route object: RIR45.171.221.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.109 of 673
Route object: RIR45.171.222.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.109 of 673
Route object: RIR45.171.223.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.109 of 673
AS-SET: not foundAS267776:AS-ALLPeeringDB names AS267776:AS-ALL; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS267776 whose prefix no peer sees AS267776 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

45.171.220.0/23RADBValid
45.171.222.0/23RADBValid
143.202.14.0/23RADBValid
2803:8e40::/32LACNICValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.