bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS266502 TimerNet Telecom

Registry name: AS266502 - TimerNet Telecom, BR · PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
5IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS266502, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS266502, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

170.244.172.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 66
170.244.174.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 66
170.244.172.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 670 100% 66
170.244.175.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 668 99% 67
2804:38cc::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 636 100% 69
2804:38cc:13::/48 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 326 51% 64
2804:38cc:14::/48 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 326 51% 64
2804:38cc:86::/48 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 326 51% 64
2804:38cc:87::/48 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 326 51% 64
170.244.172.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 126 19% 42
170.244.173.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 123 18% 41
170.244.174.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 123 18% 41

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS266502: AS-266502. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS266502 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS266502 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS266502 in itNot covered
AS-266502 In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 13 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR12
  • AS-SET: not found1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR170.244.172.0/23Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR170.244.174.0/23Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR170.244.172.0/22Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: RIR170.244.175.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.668 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:38cc::/32Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:38cc:13::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.326 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:38cc:14::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.326 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:38cc:86::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.326 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:38cc:87::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.326 of 636
Route object: RIR170.244.172.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.126 of 673
Route object: RIR170.244.173.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.123 of 673
Route object: RIR170.244.174.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.123 of 673
AS-SET: not foundAS-266502PeeringDB names AS-266502; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS266502 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.