bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS266382 Mais Provedor Serviços de Internet

Registry name: AS266382 - Mais Provedor Servicos de Internet Ltda - EPP, BR · PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
3IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS266382, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS266382, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
170.80.184.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 66
170.80.184.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 670 100% 66
170.80.186.0/23 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 668 99% 67
2804:36f4::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 635 100% 67
2804:36f4::/33 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 347 55% 64
2804:36f4:8000::/33 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 347 55% 64
170.80.184.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 203 30% 54
170.80.185.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 203 30% 54
170.80.186.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 202 30% 54
170.80.187.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 202 30% 54

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS266382: TC::AS266382:AS-MAISPROVEDOR. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS266382 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS266382 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS266382 in itNot covered
TC::AS266382:AS-MAISPROVEDOR TC 1310 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR10
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR170.80.184.0/22Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR170.80.184.0/23Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: RIR170.80.186.0/23Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.668 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:36f4::/32Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:36f4::/33Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.347 of 636
Route object: RIR2804:36f4:8000::/33Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.347 of 636
Route object: RIR170.80.184.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.203 of 673
Route object: RIR170.80.185.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.203 of 673
Route object: RIR170.80.186.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.202 of 673
Route object: RIR170.80.187.0/24Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.202 of 673

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS266382 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.