bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS265684 Infinitum

Registry name: AS265684 - INFINITUM S.A., GT · PeeringDB

0IPv4 routes
3IPv6 routes 66.7% RPKI valid · 66.7% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
14Route objects not announced registered with origin AS265684, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS265684, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2803:ac30::/32 No ROA None 636 100% 67
2803:d20::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 634 100% 67
2803:e1c0::/32 Valid RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB 1 0%low visibility 1

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS265684: AS265684:AS-PEERS. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS265684 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS265684 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS265684 in itNot covered
AS265684:AS-PEERS LACNIC 214 No 3

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 18 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: RIR1
  • AS-SET: own ASN1
  • Route object: not announced14
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none2803:ac30::/32No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS265684, maxLength 32.636 of 636
Route object: none2803:ac30::/32No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS265684 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: RIR2803:d20::/32Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.634 of 636
AS-SET: own ASNAS265684:AS-PEERSAS265684 isn't in AS265684:AS-PEERS (LACNIC) once expanded. Add AS265684 to it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS265684 whose prefix no peer sees AS265684 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

45.5.116.0/24LACNICValid
45.5.117.0/24LACNICValid
45.5.118.0/24LACNICValid
45.5.119.0/24LACNICValid
45.186.104.0/24LACNICValid
45.186.105.0/24LACNICValid
45.186.106.0/24LACNICValid
45.186.107.0/24LACNICValid
45.226.176.0/24LACNICValid
45.228.232.0/22RADBNo ROA
45.228.233.0/24LACNIC, RADBValid
45.228.234.0/24LACNICValid
45.228.235.0/24LACNICValid
2803:9760::/32RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.