bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS264571 Netfar Informatica

Registry name: AS264571 - Netfar Informatica Ltda, BR · PeeringDB

8IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS264571, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS264571, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
138.36.80.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 672 100% 66
138.36.81.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 672 100% 66
138.36.82.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 672 100% 66
138.36.80.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 66
138.36.83.0/24 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 671 100% 66
2804:21c0::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB, TC 633 100% 67
38.43.92.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 672 100% 66
38.224.252.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 672 100% 66
38.225.197.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 672 100% 66

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS264571: TC::AS264574:AS-NETFAR. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS264571 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS264571 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS264571 in itNot covered
TC::AS264574:AS-NETFAR In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 7 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR6
  • AS-SET: not found1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR138.36.80.0/22Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR138.36.81.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR138.36.82.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR138.36.80.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR138.36.83.0/24Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:21c0::/32Route object only in RADB, TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.633 of 636
AS-SET: not foundTC::AS264574:AS-NETFARPeeringDB names TC::AS264574:AS-NETFAR; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS264571 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.