bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS263656 BRSULNET TELECOM LTDA

Registry name: AS263656 - BRSULNET TELECOM LTDA, BR · PeeringDB

9IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 66.7% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 3 with no route object for this origin
1Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS263656, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS263656, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

177.52.144.0/21 Valid None 672 100% 66
201.139.84.0/22 Valid None 670 100% 66
38.250.79.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 38.250.64.0/20 2 0%low visibility 2
200.215.160.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 672 100% 66
168.197.76.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 671 100% 66
177.66.28.0/22 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 671 100% 66
2804:10fc::/32 Valid Other IRR onlyTC 636 100% 69
38.210.180.0/22 Valid RIR databaseARIN 672 100% 66
38.250.64.0/20 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 66
206.0.8.0/21 Valid RIR databaseARIN 671 100% 66

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS263656: RADB::AS263656:AS-BRSULNET. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS263656 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS263656 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS263656 in itNot covered
RADB::AS263656:AS-BRSULNET In no IRR database read today.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none3
  • Route object: RIR4
  • AS-SET: not found1
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none177.52.144.0/21No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS263656 in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: none201.139.84.0/22No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS263656 in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: none38.250.79.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 38.250.64.0/20 with origin AS263656 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS263656 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
Route object: RIR200.215.160.0/22Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673
Route object: RIR168.197.76.0/22Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR177.66.28.0/22Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.671 of 673
Route object: RIR2804:10fc::/32Route object only in TC. Add it in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
AS-SET: not foundRADB::AS263656:AS-BRSULNETPeeringDB names RADB::AS263656:AS-BRSULNET; no IRR database read has it.

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS263656 whose prefix no peer sees AS263656 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

177.66.28.0/23RADBValid
177.66.31.0/24RADBValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.