bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS215672 MoeChuang Network

Registry name: MoeChuang-Network MoeChuang Network Limited, GB · PeeringDB

3IPv4 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 0.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 0.0% with a route object
3RPKI invalid 3 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 4 with no route object for this origin
3Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS215672, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS215672, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

162.213.0.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 2 0%low visibility 2
151.242.10.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 1 0%low visibility 1
151.243.25.0/24 Invalid: origin Other origin only 1 0%low visibility 1
2a14:67c1:8000::/44 Valid None 634 100% 68

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS215672: AS215672:AS-MOECHUANG. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS215672 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS215672 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS215672 in itNot covered
AS215672:AS-MOECHUANG RIPE 213 Yes 4

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 10 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin3
  • Route object: none4
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin162.213.0.0/24ROAs covering it name AS834, not AS215672. If AS215672 should announce it, add a ROA for AS215672.2 of 673
Route object: none162.213.0.0/24Route objects for it name AS834. Add a route object with origin AS215672 in the RIR database for the space.2 of 673
ROA: origin151.242.10.0/24ROAs covering it name AS213347, not AS215672. If AS215672 should announce it, add a ROA for AS215672.1 of 673
Route object: none151.242.10.0/24Route objects for it name AS213347. Add a route object with origin AS215672 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673
ROA: origin151.243.25.0/24ROAs covering it name AS834, AS213347, not AS215672. If AS215672 should announce it, add a ROA for AS215672.1 of 673
Route object: none151.243.25.0/24Route objects for it name AS213347. Add a route object with origin AS215672 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673
Route object: none2a14:67c1:8000::/44No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS215672 in the RIR database for the space.634 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS215672 whose prefix no peer sees AS215672 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

141.11.219.0/24RADB, RIPEValid
2a13:9500:fb::/48RIPEValid
2a14:67c1:8030::/44RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.