bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS213968 NETWERKPLEK Netwerkplek IT B.V.

Registry name: NETWERKPLEK Netwerkplek IT B.V., NL · not in PeeringDB

4IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 75.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 1 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS213968, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS213968, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

86.48.68.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 86.48.68.0/22 672 100% 67
86.48.70.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
86.48.71.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
91.212.11.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
2a01:fb40::/29 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 67

AS-SET

AS213968 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 3 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none1
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none86.48.68.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 86.48.68.0/22 with origin AS213968 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS213968 in the RIR database for the space.672 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS213968 whose prefix no peer sees AS213968 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

86.48.68.0/22RIPEValid
86.48.69.0/24RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.