bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS208320 AIRMAX Georgia

Registry name: airmax AIRMAX LLC, GE · PeeringDB

5IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0IPv6 routes
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS208320, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS208320, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

45.143.108.0/22 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
45.143.108.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
45.143.109.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
45.143.110.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
45.143.111.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS208320: AS208320:AS-AIRMAX. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS208320 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS208320 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS208320 in itNot covered
AS208320:AS-AIRMAX RIPE 115 Yes 0

Fix list

Nothing to change: every route is RPKI valid with a route object in an RIR database, and every route object is announced.

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS208320 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.