bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS208208 CYBERSE

Registry name: CYBERSE Marco Lingl trading as Cyberse GmbH & Co. KG, DE · PeeringDB

6IPv4 routes 83.3% RPKI valid · 83.3% with a route object
4IPv6 routes 75.0% RPKI valid · 75.0% with a route object
2RPKI invalid 1 origin · 1 maxLength
0No ROA 2 with no route object for this origin
2Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
5Route objects not announced registered with origin AS208208, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS208208, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2a09:6301::/32 Invalid: origin None 3 0%low visibility 3
185.240.240.247/32 Invalid: maxLength Nonecovered by 185.240.240.0/24 1 0%low visibility 1
185.240.240.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
185.240.241.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
185.240.242.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
185.240.243.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 672 100% 67
81.31.199.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 671 100% 67
2a09:6302::/32 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 69
2a09:6306::/32 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 69
2a09:6307::/32 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS208208: RIPE::AS208208:AS-CYBERSE. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS208208 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS208208 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS208208 in itNot covered
RIPE::AS208208:AS-CYBERSE RIPE 3167 Yes 2

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 9 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin1
  • ROA: maxLength1
  • Route object: none2
  • Route object: not announced5
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin2a09:6301::/32ROAs covering it name AS51202, not AS208208. If AS208208 should announce it, add a ROA for AS208208.3 of 636
Route object: none2a09:6301::/32No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS208208 in the RIR database for the space.3 of 636
ROA: maxLength185.240.240.247/32ROA 185.240.240.0/24 AS208208 has maxLength 24; the route is a /32. Raise the maxLength, or add a ROA for 185.240.240.247/32.1 of 673
Route object: none185.240.240.247/32No route object for it. A route object for 185.240.240.0/24 with origin AS208208 covers it (too long for filters allowing more-specifics up to /24). Add a route object with origin AS208208 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS208208 whose prefix no peer sees AS208208 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

77.90.30.0/24RIPEValid
2a09:6305::/32RIPEValid
2a0c:2500:571::/52RIPEInvalid: origin
2a0c:2500:572::/52RIPEInvalid: origin
2a14:7c0:1003::/48RIPEInvalid: origin

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.