Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS207474 HatNet
Registry name: HatNet Hatnet Bilgi iletisim Teknolojileri ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, TR · PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS207474, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 207.230.4.0/24 | Invalid: origin | None | 19 3%low visibility |
| 207.230.3.0/24 | Invalid: origin | RIR databaseARIN | 19 3%low visibility |
| 153.56.169.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 673 100% |
| 131.222.207.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 131.222.229.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 671 100% |
| 131.222.223.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 670 100% |
AS-SET
AS207474's PeeringDB record names no AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 5 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: origin2
- Route object: none1
- Route object: not announced2
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: origin | 207.230.4.0/24 | An AS0 ROA covers it (the holder's statement that it shouldn't be routed). If AS207474 should announce it, add a ROA for AS207474. |
| Route object: none | 207.230.4.0/24 | No route object for it. Add a route object with origin AS207474 in the RIR database for the space. |
| ROA: origin | 207.230.3.0/24 | ROAs covering it name AS174, not AS207474. If AS207474 should announce it, add a ROA for AS207474. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS207474 whose prefix no peer sees AS207474 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 207.230.6.0/24 | ARIN | Invalid: origin |
| 207.230.7.0/24 | ARIN | Invalid: origin |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.