bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS205109 DXTL-UK Dingfeng Xinhui (Hongkong) Technology Limited

Registry name: DXTL-UK Dingfeng Xinhui (Hongkong) Technology Limited, HK · not in PeeringDB

0IPv4 routes
1IPv6 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS205109, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS205109, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
2a14:cc80::/48 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 69

AS-SET

AS205109 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none2a14:cc80::/48No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS205109, maxLength 48.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS205109 whose prefix no peer sees AS205109 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

5.182.216.0/22RADBNo ROA
93.93.243.0/24RIPENo ROA
122.10.120.0/24RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.