bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS205022 ESCROW Join-stock company "Internet Exchange"MSK-IX"

Registry name: ESCROW Join-stock company "Internet Exchange"MSK-IX", RU · not in PeeringDB

2IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
1IPv6 routes 0.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
1No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
1Route objects not announced registered with origin AS205022, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS205022, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
2001:6d0:6d08::/48 No ROA RIR databaseRIPE 636 100% 67
193.232.72.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 66
193.232.73.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 669 99% 66

AS-SET

AS205022 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 2 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none1
  • Route object: not announced1
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none2001:6d0:6d08::/48No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS205022, maxLength 48.636 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS205022 whose prefix no peer sees AS205022 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

2001:6d0:6d09::/48RIPENo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.