Network · data from 2026-11-12
AS204628 AS-Network-Service Valor Information Technologies, S.L.
Registry name: AS-Network-Service Valor Information Technologies, S.L., ES · not in PeeringDB
Announced routes
Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS204628, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
| 2001:4030::/32 | No ROA | RIR databaseRIPE | 2 0%low visibility |
| 131.161.201.0/24 | Valid | RIR databaseLACNIC, RADB | 673 100% |
| 2001:4030::/33 | Valid | RIR databaseRIPE | 634 100% |
AS-SET
AS204628 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.
Fix list
The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 3 are in fix.csv.
- ROA: none1
- Route object: not announced2
| Change | Prefix or set | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| ROA: none | 2001:4030::/32 | No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS204628, maxLength 32. |
Route objects not announced
Route objects with origin AS204628 whose prefix no peer sees AS204628 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).
| 80.66.115.0/24 | RIPE | Invalid: origin |
| 91.132.31.0/24 | RIPE | Invalid: origin |
Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.