bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS203861 ServerExpress

Registry name: SERVEREXPRESS-AS Miteflux Technologies Ltd, GB · PeeringDB

7IPv4 routes 71.4% RPKI valid · 71.4% with a route object
2IPv6 routes 50.0% RPKI valid · 50.0% with a route object
3RPKI invalid 2 origin · 1 maxLength
0No ROA 3 with no route object for this origin
3Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS203861, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS203861, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2a14:c380:1200::/40 Invalid: origin Other origin only 29 5%low visibility 22
217.60.78.188/32 Invalid: origin Nonecovered by 217.60.76.0/22 0 0%low visibility 2
31.59.160.9/32 Invalid: maxLength Nonecovered by 31.59.160.0/24 1 0%low visibility 1
31.59.160.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 671 100% 67
217.60.29.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 670 100% 66
5.175.215.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 669 99% 67
31.58.218.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 669 99% 66
217.60.77.0/24 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 667 99% 68
2a14:c380:1100::/40 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 632 99% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS203861: AS203861:AS-MITEFLUX. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS203861 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS203861 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS203861 in itNot covered
AS203861:AS-MITEFLUX RIPE 6216 Yes 3

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 9 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: origin2
  • ROA: maxLength1
  • Route object: none3
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: origin2a14:c380:1200::/40ROAs covering it name AS198189, not AS203861. If AS203861 should announce it, add a ROA for AS203861.29 of 636
Route object: none2a14:c380:1200::/40Route objects for it name AS198189. Add a route object with origin AS203861 in the RIR database for the space.29 of 636
ROA: origin217.60.78.188/32ROAs covering it name AS198189, not AS203861. If AS203861 should announce it, add a ROA for AS203861.0 of 673
Route object: none217.60.78.188/32No route object for it. A route object for 217.60.76.0/22 with origin AS203861 covers it (too long for filters allowing more-specifics up to /24). Add a route object with origin AS203861 in the RIR database for the space.0 of 673
ROA: maxLength31.59.160.9/32ROA 31.59.160.0/24 AS203861 has maxLength 24; the route is a /32. Raise the maxLength, or add a ROA for 31.59.160.9/32.1 of 673
Route object: none31.59.160.9/32No route object for it. A route object for 31.59.160.0/24 with origin AS203861 covers it (too long for filters allowing more-specifics up to /24). Add a route object with origin AS203861 in the RIR database for the space.1 of 673

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS203861 whose prefix no peer sees AS203861 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

65.64.2.0/24ALTDBNo ROA
67.67.246.0/24ALTDBNo ROA
217.60.76.0/22RADBNo ROA

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.