bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS200462 Lennart Seitz trading as ETH-Services

Registry name: AS-ETH Lennart Seitz trading as "ETH-Services", DE · PeeringDB

5IPv4 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 60.0% with a route object
6IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 66.7% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 4 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
2Route objects not announced registered with origin AS200462, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS200462, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
45.86.125.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 45.86.124.0/23 670 100% 67
2.58.53.0/24 Valid Nonecovered by 2.58.52.0/23 667 99% 67
2a0c:8905::/32 Valid Nonecovered by 2a0c:8900::/29 636 100% 67
2a0c:8906::/32 Valid Nonecovered by 2a0c:8900::/29 635 100% 67
2.58.52.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
5.180.192.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
45.86.124.0/23 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 673 100% 67
2a07:6fc0:10::/44 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 636 100% 67
2a09:e1c0::/32 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 636 100% 67
2a0c:8900::/29 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 67
2a0e:de80::/29 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 635 100% 67

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS200462: AS-ETH. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS200462 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS200462 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS200462 in itNot covered
AS-ETH RIPE 235171 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 6 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: none4
  • Route object: not announced2
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: none45.86.125.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 45.86.124.0/23 with origin AS200462 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS200462 in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
Route object: none2.58.53.0/24No route object for it. A route object for 2.58.52.0/23 with origin AS200462 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS200462 in the RIR database for the space.667 of 673
Route object: none2a0c:8905::/32No route object for it. A route object for 2a0c:8900::/29 with origin AS200462 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS200462 in the RIR database for the space.636 of 636
Route object: none2a0c:8906::/32No route object for it. A route object for 2a0c:8900::/29 with origin AS200462 covers it (filters allowing more-specifics accept it). Add a route object with origin AS200462 in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS200462 whose prefix no peer sees AS200462 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

94.247.43.0/24RIPEValid
2a00:f826:8::/48RIPEValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.