bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS199406 JINHAN-NET Jin Han Shen trading as Yinyun Network Technology Studio

Registry name: JINHAN-NET Jin Han Shen trading as Yinyun Network Technology Studio, CN · not in PeeringDB

0IPv4 routes
1IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
3Route objects not announced registered with origin AS199406, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS199406, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.
2a12:bec0:1a0::/44 Valid Other IRR onlyRADB 635 100% 67

AS-SET

AS199406 isn't in PeeringDB, where networks name their AS-SET.

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 4 are in fix.csv.

  • Route object: RIR1
  • Route object: not announced3
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
Route object: RIR2a12:bec0:1a0::/44Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS199406 whose prefix no peer sees AS199406 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

208.103.182.0/24RADBNo ROA
2602:f2dc:b1::/48ARINValid
2a14:67c3:1000::/44RADBValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.