bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS199183 Arjen Essink

Registry name: Arjen-Essink Arjen Olaf Essink, NL · PeeringDB

0IPv4 routes
5IPv6 routes 100.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
0No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
0Route objects not announced registered with origin AS199183, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS199183, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

2a0e:b107:b13::/48 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69
2a14:7581:ff4::/48 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69
2a14:7581:9f51::/48 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69
2a14:7581:9f52::/48 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69
2a14:7581:9f55::/48 Valid RIR databaseRIPE 634 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS199183: AS199183:AS-ESSINK. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS199183 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS199183 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS199183 in itNot covered
AS199183:AS-ESSINK RIPE 115 Yes 0

Fix list

Nothing to change: every route is RPKI valid with a route object in an RIR database, and every route object is announced.

Route objects not announced

Every route object with origin AS199183 is announced.

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.