bgpreport

Network · data from 2026-11-12

AS18934 SMITH & HAMMAKER

Registry name: TENHATS - TenHats, LLC, US · PeeringDB

10IPv4 routes 90.0% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
3IPv6 routes 66.7% RPKI valid · 100.0% with a route object
0RPKI invalid 0 origin · 0 maxLength
2No ROA 0 with no route object for this origin
0Low visibility seen by under 10% of full-table peers
11Route objects not announced registered with origin AS18934, seen from no peer

Announced routes

Every prefix a peer of the route collectors sees with origin AS18934, things to look at first. Visibility = full-table peers that see it, of 673 (IPv4) and 636 (IPv6) on 75 collectors. Also as routes.csv.

192.41.228.0/24 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 670 100% 68
2620:131:c008::/48 No ROA Other IRR onlyRADB 635 100% 69
142.202.70.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 673 100% 67
142.202.68.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 670 100% 68
142.202.69.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 670 100% 68
142.202.71.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 670 100% 68
148.59.132.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN 670 100% 68
162.208.104.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 670 100% 68
162.208.105.0/24 Valid RIR databaseALTDB, ARIN 670 100% 68
162.208.106.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 670 100% 68
162.208.107.0/24 Valid RIR databaseARIN, RADB 670 100% 68
2605:9a40:6a::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 635 100% 69
2605:9a40:1::/48 Valid RIR databaseARIN 634 100% 69

AS-SET

PeeringDB's irr_as_set for AS18934: AS-18934-TENHATS. Expanded from the day's IRR dumps the way bgpq4 does against whois.radb.net: a name with a database is read from that database only, one without from the first database in RADB's order. "Not covered" = this network's own routes that a filter built from the set would leave out (AS18934 isn't in the set, or no route object for AS18934 covers the route; more-specifics of a route object are accepted down to /24 and /48, as with bgpq4 -A -R 24 / -R 48). Customers' routes aren't counted: the collectors show each route's origin, not which network it came through.

NameDatabaseASNsSets Route objectsAS18934 in itNot covered
AS-18934-TENHATS ARIN 3125 Yes 0

Fix list

The changes that would bring RPKI, the IRR and what's announced into line. Some are deliberate (a route object kept for a backup route, say); the network decides. All 15 are in fix.csv.

  • ROA: none2
  • Route object: RIR2
  • Route object: not announced11
ChangePrefix or setDetailFull-table peers
ROA: none192.41.228.0/24No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS18934, maxLength 24.670 of 673
Route object: RIR192.41.228.0/24Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.670 of 673
ROA: none2620:131:c008::/48No ROA covers it. Add a ROA for AS18934, maxLength 48.635 of 636
Route object: RIR2620:131:c008::/48Route object only in RADB. Add it in the RIR database for the space.635 of 636

Route objects not announced

Route objects with origin AS18934 whose prefix no peer sees AS18934 announce. Many are kept on purpose (backup routes, space announced only in some places).

12.52.182.0/24RADBNo ROA
143.203.120.0/24ARINValid
143.203.121.0/24ARINValid
143.203.122.0/24ARINValid
143.203.123.0/24ARINValid
162.208.104.0/22RADBNo ROA
198.140.116.0/22RADBNo ROA
2605:9a40::/32ARINValid
2605:9a40:68::/48ARINValid
2605:9a40:69::/48ARINValid
2605:9a40:6b::/48ARINValid

Routes: the 08:00 UTC snapshots of 2026-11-12 from 75 RIPE RIS and RouteViews collectors. RPKI: our rpki-client run before the snapshot. IRR: the day's dumps of the five RIR databases and RADB's mirrors. The LEVEL3 and IDNIC databases publish no dump and aren't read, so route objects only there count as none.